نمود مذاهب بزرگ در گفتمان آمریکایی: تحلیلی مبتنی بر زبانشناسی پیکرهای
DOI::
https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2022.23کلمات کلیدی:
زبانشناسی پیکرهای, مجموعه انگلیسی معاصر آمریکایی, تحلیل گفتمان انتقادیهای مذهبی, نمود ادیان بزرگ, گفتمان آمریکاییچکیده
در این مطالعه سعی شد با کمک زبانشناسی پیکرهای و اصول تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی، نحوۀ نمود ادیان بزرگ در گفتمان آمریکایی مشخص شود. برای این کار از مجموعه انگلیسی معاصر آمریکایی و چارچوب استراتژی گفتمانی ون دایک (2004) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین استفاده از استراتژی واژگانی سازی بود. همچنین مشخص شد که از این راهبرد گفتمانی برای انتقال معانی مثبت یا منفی خاصی در ذهن مخاطب در رابطه با نظامهای مذهبی و اعتقادی مختلف استفاده شده است. بر این اساس، مشخض شد که دین اسلام بسیار سیاسی شده است در حالی که بودیسم کمترین حضور در جامعه سیاسی را داشت. مسيحيت نيز سياسي شده بود، اما بيشتر از نظر مسائل و رويدادهاي ديني و تاريخي- مذهبي. تغییرات در بازنمایی ایدئولوژیک یهودیت کاملاً محسوس بوده است. در نهایت، مشخص شد که الحاد در مجموعه انگلیسی معاصر آمریکایی به عنوان یک سیستم اعتقادی طولانی نمایان شده است و دانشمندان برجسته، افراد موفق و جامعه دگرباشان جنسی بدان روی آوردهاند.
مراجع
Abdeslam, A. (2019): The Representation of Islam and Muslims in French Print Media Discourse: LeMonde and LeFigaro as Case Studies. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 11 (2), 1-14.
Akbarzadeh, S. and B. Smith. (2005). The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media (The Age and Herald Newspapers). Monash University.
Alfajri, N. (2017). Hegemonic and minority discourses around immigrants: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 381-390.
Arweck, E., & Nesbit, E. (2011). Religious education in the experience of young people from mixed-faith families. British Journal of Religious Education, 33 (1), 31-45.
Awass, O. (1996). The representation of Islam in the American media. Hamdard Islamicus. 19(3), 87–102.
Bhatia, A. (2009). The discourses of terrorism. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 279–289.
Baker, P. Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski. M., McEnery, T., and Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2012). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslims” in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255-278.
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., McKee, S., & Gervais, W. M. (2018). Atheist horns and religious halos: Mental representations of atheists and theists. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 147(2), 292–297.
Dawson, L. & Cowan, D. (2004). Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York, Routledge.
Dunn, K. (2001). Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney. Tijdschrit voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(3), 291–308.
Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2018). A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(2),2-17.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. (Vol. 2, pp. 258-84). London: Longman.
Fayyaz, S., & Shirazi, R. (2013). Good Iranian, Bad Iranian: Representations of Iran and Iranians in Time and Newsweek (1998–2009). Iranian Studies, 46 (1), 53-72.
Firdhani, A., Indrayani, L., & Soemantri, S. (2018). How Islam is Represented in The United States Newspapers Published in COCA, Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics, Indonasia.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), Critical Discourse analysis in education (pp. 19–50). New Jersey/London: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(12), 1189–1206.
Gervais, W. M., Xygalatas, D., McKay, R. T., Van Elk, M., Buchtel, E. E., Aveyard, M., Schiavone, S. R., Dar-Nimrod, I., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Riekki, T. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(8), 41-56.
Goldberg, C. (2017). Modernity and the Jews in Western Social Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gregg, C. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Gu, C. (2018). Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (2), 1-21.
Hackett, M., & Lipka, M. (2018). The demographic factors that make Islam the world's fastest-growing major religious group. The Ethnic and Religious Future of Europe, 28 (2), 23-36.
Johnson, c., Thigpen, c., & Funk, C. (2020, August 26). On the Intersection of Science and Religion. https://www.pewforum.org/essay/on-the-intersection-of-science-and-religion/
Kibirige, H. & DePalo, L. (2017). The Internet as a Source of Academic Research Information: Findings of Two Pilot Studies. Information Technology and Libraries, 19 (1), 11-16.
Khaghanine¬jad M. S., & Kaashef, F. (2014). Applying cooperative language learning techniques in Iranian ELT context. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(3)238-246.
Khodadady, E., Alavi, S. M., & Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2012). Schema-based Instruction: A novel approach of teaching English to Iranian University Students. Ferdowsi Review, 5, 3-21.
Khodadady, E., Alavi, S. M., Pishghadam, R. & Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2012). Teaching General English in Academic Context: Schema-Based or Translation-Based Approach? International journal of linguistics, 4(1), 56-76.
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological measurement, 30, 607-610.
Kress, G. (1990). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 84-99.
Lewis, V., & Kashyap, R. (2013). Piety in a Secular Society: Migration, Religiosity, and Islam in Britain. International Migration, 51 (3), 21-45.
Lipka, M. (2015). 10 facts about religion in America. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/27/10-facts-about-religion-in-america/.
Moss., A., Fitzpatrick, J., & O’Brien, L. (2020). Attributions for Atheism: Perceptions that Atheism is a Choice are Associated with Prejudice against Atheists among Christians, but Not Jews or Nonbelievers. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5(3), 1-20.
Min, P., & Kim, D. (2005). Intergenerational Transmission of Religion and Culture: Korean Protestants in the U.S. Sociology of Religion, 6 (3), 263-282.
Neelam, M. (2017). Diverse Representation of Muslim Women in the US Newspapers-A Corpus Based Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 34, 27-32.
O’Connor, P. (2003). Activist Sociolinguistics in a Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis, 223-240.
Parham, A. (2019). A racial re-framing of Modernity and the Jews. Journal of Classical Sociology, 6 (3), 1-9.
Pew Research Center. (2013, August 19). Religion Trends in the U.S. https://www.pewforum.org/2013/08/19/event-transcript-religion-trends-in-the-u-s/
Pew Research Center. (2013, October 10). Changing Identity of Jewish Americans – Implications for Social and Political Engagement. https://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/10/event-transcript-changing-identity-of-jewish-americans-implications-for-social-and-political-engagement/
Pew Research Center. (2015, November 16). Is the American Public Becoming Less Religious? https://www.pewforum.org/2015/11/16/event-is-the-american-public-becoming-less-religious/
Pew Research Center. (2017, April 26). In America, Does More Education Equal Less Religion? https://www.pewforum.org/2017/04/26/in-america-does-more-education-equal-less-religion/
Pew Research Center. (2017, July 26). Demographic portrait of Muslim Americans. https://www.pewforum.org/2017/07/26/demographic-portrait-of-muslim-americans/
Pew Research Center. (2017, August 9). Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
Ragozina, S. (2020). Constructing the Image of Islam in contemporary Russian print media: the language strategies and politics of misrepresentation. Religion, State & Society, 48(1), 22-37.
Sandstrom, A., & Schwadel, P. (2019, June 13). Lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans are more critical of churches than straight adults are. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/13/lesbian-gay-and-bisexual-americans-are-more-critical-of-churches-than-straight-adults-are/
Seager, R. (2012). Buddhism in America. New York: Colombia University Press.
Subtirelu, N. (2013). English… it's part of our blood: Ideologies of language and nation in United States Congressional discourse. Journal of socioilinguistics, 17 (1), 37-56.
Smith, H. (2008). The Participatory Turn: Spirituality, Mysticism, Religious Studies. New York Press: USA.
Sorlin, S. (2016). Language and Manipulation in House of Cards. Palgrave Macmillan: UK.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & G. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. (2001). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (pp. 300–317). London: SAGE.
Van Dijk, T. (2004). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
Williams, R. (1976). Politics and Theory in the academics. New York: Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London, England: Sage.
##submission.downloads##
چاپ شده
ارجاع به مقاله
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
حق نشر 2022 Mohammad Saber Khaghaninejad, Amirsaeid Moloodi, Shiva Yazdani
این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 می باشد.
فصلنامه هنر زبان یک مجله دسترسی آزاد است و مقالات پس از پذیرش در دسترس عموم قرار می گیرند و استفاده از آن با ذکر منبع آزاد است