Representation of Major Religious Orientations in American Discourse: A Corpus-based Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2022.23Keywords:
Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics, Corpus of Contemporary American English, Critical Discourse Analysis, Religious Orientations, Representation, American DiscourseAbstract
This study outlines how the aid of both corpus-based sociolinguistics and principles of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) can help expose the subtle value-laden ideological representations of major religious orientations in American discourse. To do this, COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) and Van Dijk’s Discursive Strategy Framework (2004) were employed. Results indicated that the most highly used strategy was Lexicalization. It was further revealed that this discursive strategy was utilized to convey certain positive or negative connotations in the audience’s mind regarding different religious and belief systems. Accordingly, the most politicized religion was Islam, while Buddhism was the least politicized one. Its representation was also not as ideologically-loaded compared to other belief systems. Christianity was politicized, too, but mostly in terms of religious and historical-religious issues and events. Shifts in ideological representation of Judaism have been completely palpable. Finally, atheism has been depicted in COCA as a long-running belief system highly attributed to bona fide scientists, progressive-minded people, and the LGBTQ community.References
Abdeslam, A. (2019): The Representation of Islam and Muslims in French Print Media Discourse: LeMonde and LeFigaro as Case Studies. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 11 (2), 1-14.
Akbarzadeh, S. and B. Smith. (2005). The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media (The Age and Herald Newspapers). Monash University.
Alfajri, N. (2017). Hegemonic and minority discourses around immigrants: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 381-390.
Arweck, E., & Nesbit, E. (2011). Religious education in the experience of young people from mixed-faith families. British Journal of Religious Education, 33 (1), 31-45.
Awass, O. (1996). The representation of Islam in the American media. Hamdard Islamicus. 19(3), 87–102.
Bhatia, A. (2009). The discourses of terrorism. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 279–289.
Baker, P. Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski. M., McEnery, T., and Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2012). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslims” in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255-278.
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., McKee, S., & Gervais, W. M. (2018). Atheist horns and religious halos: Mental representations of atheists and theists. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 147(2), 292–297.
Dawson, L. & Cowan, D. (2004). Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York, Routledge.
Dunn, K. (2001). Representations of Islam in the politics of mosque development in Sydney. Tijdschrit voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(3), 291–308.
Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2018). A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(2),2-17.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. (Vol. 2, pp. 258-84). London: Longman.
Fayyaz, S., & Shirazi, R. (2013). Good Iranian, Bad Iranian: Representations of Iran and Iranians in Time and Newsweek (1998–2009). Iranian Studies, 46 (1), 53-72.
Firdhani, A., Indrayani, L., & Soemantri, S. (2018). How Islam is Represented in The United States Newspapers Published in COCA, Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics, Indonasia.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), Critical Discourse analysis in education (pp. 19–50). New Jersey/London: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(12), 1189–1206.
Gervais, W. M., Xygalatas, D., McKay, R. T., Van Elk, M., Buchtel, E. E., Aveyard, M., Schiavone, S. R., Dar-Nimrod, I., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Riekki, T. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(8), 41-56.
Goldberg, C. (2017). Modernity and the Jews in Western Social Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gregg, C. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Gu, C. (2018). Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (2), 1-21.
Hackett, M., & Lipka, M. (2018). The demographic factors that make Islam the world's fastest-growing major religious group. The Ethnic and Religious Future of Europe, 28 (2), 23-36.
Johnson, c., Thigpen, c., & Funk, C. (2020, August 26). On the Intersection of Science and Religion. https://www.pewforum.org/essay/on-the-intersection-of-science-and-religion/
Kibirige, H. & DePalo, L. (2017). The Internet as a Source of Academic Research Information: Findings of Two Pilot Studies. Information Technology and Libraries, 19 (1), 11-16.
Khaghanine¬jad M. S., & Kaashef, F. (2014). Applying cooperative language learning techniques in Iranian ELT context. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(3)238-246.
Khodadady, E., Alavi, S. M., & Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2012). Schema-based Instruction: A novel approach of teaching English to Iranian University Students. Ferdowsi Review, 5, 3-21.
Khodadady, E., Alavi, S. M., Pishghadam, R. & Khaghaninejad, M. S. (2012). Teaching General English in Academic Context: Schema-Based or Translation-Based Approach? International journal of linguistics, 4(1), 56-76.
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological measurement, 30, 607-610.
Kress, G. (1990). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 84-99.
Lewis, V., & Kashyap, R. (2013). Piety in a Secular Society: Migration, Religiosity, and Islam in Britain. International Migration, 51 (3), 21-45.
Lipka, M. (2015). 10 facts about religion in America. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/27/10-facts-about-religion-in-america/.
Moss., A., Fitzpatrick, J., & O’Brien, L. (2020). Attributions for Atheism: Perceptions that Atheism is a Choice are Associated with Prejudice against Atheists among Christians, but Not Jews or Nonbelievers. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5(3), 1-20.
Min, P., & Kim, D. (2005). Intergenerational Transmission of Religion and Culture: Korean Protestants in the U.S. Sociology of Religion, 6 (3), 263-282.
Neelam, M. (2017). Diverse Representation of Muslim Women in the US Newspapers-A Corpus Based Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 34, 27-32.
O’Connor, P. (2003). Activist Sociolinguistics in a Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis, 223-240.
Parham, A. (2019). A racial re-framing of Modernity and the Jews. Journal of Classical Sociology, 6 (3), 1-9.
Pew Research Center. (2013, August 19). Religion Trends in the U.S. https://www.pewforum.org/2013/08/19/event-transcript-religion-trends-in-the-u-s/
Pew Research Center. (2013, October 10). Changing Identity of Jewish Americans – Implications for Social and Political Engagement. https://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/10/event-transcript-changing-identity-of-jewish-americans-implications-for-social-and-political-engagement/
Pew Research Center. (2015, November 16). Is the American Public Becoming Less Religious? https://www.pewforum.org/2015/11/16/event-is-the-american-public-becoming-less-religious/
Pew Research Center. (2017, April 26). In America, Does More Education Equal Less Religion? https://www.pewforum.org/2017/04/26/in-america-does-more-education-equal-less-religion/
Pew Research Center. (2017, July 26). Demographic portrait of Muslim Americans. https://www.pewforum.org/2017/07/26/demographic-portrait-of-muslim-americans/
Pew Research Center. (2017, August 9). Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
Ragozina, S. (2020). Constructing the Image of Islam in contemporary Russian print media: the language strategies and politics of misrepresentation. Religion, State & Society, 48(1), 22-37.
Sandstrom, A., & Schwadel, P. (2019, June 13). Lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans are more critical of churches than straight adults are. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/13/lesbian-gay-and-bisexual-americans-are-more-critical-of-churches-than-straight-adults-are/
Seager, R. (2012). Buddhism in America. New York: Colombia University Press.
Subtirelu, N. (2013). English… it's part of our blood: Ideologies of language and nation in United States Congressional discourse. Journal of socioilinguistics, 17 (1), 37-56.
Smith, H. (2008). The Participatory Turn: Spirituality, Mysticism, Religious Studies. New York Press: USA.
Sorlin, S. (2016). Language and Manipulation in House of Cards. Palgrave Macmillan: UK.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & G. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. (2001). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S.J. Yates (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (pp. 300–317). London: SAGE.
Van Dijk, T. (2004). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
Williams, R. (1976). Politics and Theory in the academics. New York: Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–95). London, England: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammad Saber Khaghaninejad, Amirsaeid Moloodi, Shiva Yazdani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
