Intentionality in Speech Act Theory: The Derrida-Searle Debate

Authors

  • Abd El Hak Gasmi PhD (Research Professor, Section B) linguistic sciences National Institute for Research in Education Algiers, Algeria

Keywords:

Intentionality, Speech Acts, Deconstructive Analysis, November 1st Declaration, Iterability, Context, Pragmatics

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of intentionality in speech act theory by synthesizing analytical and deconstructive approaches, as exemplified in the works of John Searle and Jacques Derrida. The study employs the November 1st Declaration, the founding document of the Algerian Revolution, as a case study to apply this dual perspective. The research adopts a multidimensional methodology that combines critical theoretical analysis, linguistic examination, and comparative case study. The analysis reveals that integrating these approaches offers a more holistic understanding of speech acts, highlighting both their transformative power (Searle) and their multifaceted, mutable nature (Derrida). This finding suggests that the optimal application of speech act theory requires a synthesis of analytical and deconstructive school methodologies.

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Gasmi, A. E. H. (2024). Intentionality in Speech Act Theory: The Derrida-Searle Debate. LANGUAGE ART, 9(4). Retrieved from https://languageart.ir/index.php/LA/article/view/428

Most read articles by the same author(s)