التَّأْصِيلُ اللِّسَانِيُّ لِخِطَابِ الْكَرَاهِيَّة: دِرَاسَةٌ تَحْلِيلِيَّة فِي اَلْمُنْجَز اَلْحُقُوقِيِّ

meriem agrine

Authors

meriem agrine Biskra university

Keywords:

discourse, hate, crime, linguistic analysis, discourse intensity, marginalized groups

Abstract

The paper aims at an in-depth and accurate analysis of the scope of hate speech and attempts to root it out; Its concept, context, and actors in it, influencing and being affected. Today, “hate speech” refers to a variety of acts of speech and other misbehavior that occur in society, ranging from uncivilized and disturbing speech (which is often tolerated) to actions that are criminalized under the law. From here, the idea of this study was born in an attempt to linguistically analyze the idea of hate speech in the linguistic and legal contexts, through multidisciplinary research that tries to root the concept and encompass its various aspects, and tries to provide a linguistic-legal methodological guide that will contribute in some way to clarifying the dimensions of the idea of hate speech and drawing dividing lines. between "hate speech" and "hate crime" by analyzing prevailing linguistic standards and trying to develop them to bridge this scientific gap. The study concluded that "hatred" in itself, as a negative human emotion, is not a crime. and that the main or central feature in criminalizing “hate speech” is related to the symbolic dimension; By committing a hate crime, the perpetrator sends a message to the victim and to his community at the same time. Because the crime is designed, essentially, to send a message, not only to the immediate victim, but also to the community to which she belongs. The study also presented a hierarchical linguistic semantic scale to measure and analyze the "intensity" of hate speech. Ultimately, then, hate crimes can be seen as "symbolic messaging crimes" that convey the idea of "otherness" and act as an exclusionary practice.

References

• أولا: باللغة العربية

- الأمم المتحدة (2012). الجمعية العامة، تعزيز الحق في حرية الرأي والتعبير وحمايته، مذكرة الأمين العام، الدورة 67، نيويورك، 07 سبتمبر 2012، ص.25.

- مركز هردو لدعم التعبير الرقمي (2016). خطابات الكراهية وقود الغضب: نظرة على مفاهيم أساسية في الإطار الدولي، القاهرة.

- الخليل بن أحمد الفراهيدي (د.س.ن). كتاب العين، تح: مهدي المخزومي وآخرون، سلسلة المعاجم والفهارس، 4/222.

- ابن منظور، (د.س.ن). لسان العرب، تح: عبد الله علي الكبير وآخرون، دار المعارف، القاهرة، ص1194.

• ثانيا: باللغة الأجنبية

Anat, B.-D., and Matamoros-Fernandez, A. (2016). Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: monitoring the facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain. Int. J. Commun. 10, 1167–1193.

Antoine Buyse, “Words of Violence: ‘Fear Speech,’ or How Violent Conflict Escalation Relates to the Freedom of Expression,” Human Rights Quarterly 36, no. 4 (2014): 779–97.

An Activist's Guide to The Yogyakarta Principles Report (2010). 14 November 2010. p. 125.

Babak Bahador, “Rehumanizing Enemy Images: Media Framing from War to Peace,” in Forming a Culture of Peace: Reframing Narratives of Intergroup Relations, Equity and Justice, ed. K.V. Korostelina (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 195–211

Babak Bahador, Classifying and Identifying the Intensity of Hate Speech, Insights from the Social Sciences; items.ssrc.org

Bahador, B. ( 2020, November 17). Classifying and Identifying the Intensity of Hate Speech. Retrieved from Insights from the Social Sciences : https://items.ssrc.org/disinformation-democracy-and-conflict-prevention/classifying-and-identifying-the-intensity-of-hate-speech/

Bahador, B. (2015) The Media and Deconstruction of the Enemy Image. In V. Hawkins and L. Hoffmann (eds), Communication and Peace: Mapping an emerging field. New York: Routledge, 120-132.

Baider, F. H. (2019). Le discours de haine dissimulée: le mépris pour humilier. Dév. Soc. 43:359.

Baider, F. H., Assimakopoulos, S., and Millar, S. L. (2017). “Hate speech in the EU and the CONTACT project,” in Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, eds S. Assimakopoulos, F. H. Baider, and S. Millar (Cham: Springer), 1–6.

Baider, F. H., Assimakopoulos, S., and Millar, S. L. (2017). “Hate speech in the EU and the CONTACT project,” in Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, eds S. Assimakopoulos, F. H. Baider, and S. Millar (Cham: Springer), 1–6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5

Benesch, S. (2013, February 23). Retrieved from dangerous speech: https://dangerousspeech.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Dangerous-Speech-Guidelines-2013.pdf

Bennett, John. "The Totalitarian Ideological Origins of Hate Speech Regulation." Cap. UL Rev. 46 (2018): 23.

Berk, R. A., Boyd, E. A., & Hammer, K. M. (2003). Thinking more clearly about hate-motivated crimes. In B. Perry (Ed.), Hate and bias crime: A reader (pp. 123–15). Routledge. p.51.

Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I., and Moore, K. (2015). Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries. Report for the UNHCR. Available online at: http://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/56bb369c9/press-coverage-refugee-migrantcrisis-eu-content-analysis-five-european.html

Bleich, E. (2011). The Freedom to be Racist? How the United States and Europe Struggle to Preserve Freedom and Combat Racism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, A. (2017a). What is hate speech? Part 1: the myth of hate. Law Philos. 36, 419–468.

Brown, A. (2017b). What is hate speech? Part 2: family resemblances. Law Philos. 36, 561–613.

Brown, A. (2018). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities 18, 297–326. doi: 10.1177/1468796817709846

Brown, A. (2018). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities 18, 297–326.

Brown-Sica, Margaret; Beall Jeffrey (2008). Library 2.0 and the Problem of Hate Speech". Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. v.9 no.2 (Summer 2008).

Brudholm, T. (2016). Conceptualizing hatred globally: Is hate crime a human rights violation? In J. Schweppe & M. A. Walters (Eds.), The globalization of hate: Internationalizing hate crime? (pp. 33). Oxford University Press. P.34-35

Burnap, P., and Williams, M. L. (2015). Cyber hate speech on Twitter: an application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy Internet 7, 223–242.

Calvert, C. (1997). Hate speech and its harms: a communication theory perspective. J. Commun. 17, 4–16. x

Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.

Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers (1997). Recommendation 97(20) of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on “Hate Speech”. Available online at: https://rm.coe.int/1680505d5b

Criminal Justice Act 2003. www.legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 3 January 2017.

Daniels, J. (2009). Cloaked websites: propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media Soc. 11, 659–683.

Edelstein, Y., and Wolf, C. (2013). Report and recommendations of the Task Force on Internet Hate of the Inter-Parliamentary Coalitions for Combating Anti-Semitism (ICCA). Available online at: http://www.adl.org/assets/pdf/press-center/ICCA-Report.pdf

European Commission (2016). Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online. Announced together with the IT companies. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/hate_speech_code_of_conduct_en.pdf

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2012) Making hate crime visible in the European union: Acknowledging victims’ rights. Available at: http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2012_hate-crime.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2014). p.18.

Farkas, J., and Neumayer, C. (2018). “Disguised propaganda from digital to social media,” in Second International Handbook of Internet Research, eds J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. M. Allen (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_33-1.

Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., and Martinez, G. (2015). Countering Online Hate Speech. UNESCO Series on Internet Freedom. Paris: UNESCO.

Gerstenfeld, P. B. (2012). Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies (3rd edn). Sage. p.11.

Gerstenfeld, P. B. (1992). Smile when you call me that!: The problems with punishing hate motivated behavior. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10(2), p. 267.

Gerstenfeld, P. B. (2013). Hate crimes: Causes, controls and controversies (3rd ed.). Sage. P.11.

Goodall, K. (2010). Challenging hate speech: Incitement to hatred on grounds of sexual orientation in England, wales and Northern Ireland. In P. Chan (Ed.), Protection of sexual minorities since stonewall: Progress and stalemate developed and developing countries (pp. 211-232). Routledge.

Goodall, K. (2013). Conceptualising ‘racism’ in criminal law. Legal Studies, 33(2), 215.

Gustavo Ariel Kaufman, Liberté d'expression et protection des groupes vulnérables sur internet, L'Harmattan, France: 2016, 147-171.

Hall, N. (2013). Hate crime (2nd ed.). Routledge. p.09

Hardaker, C., and McGlashan, M. (2016). ‘Real men don't hate women': Twitter rape threats and group identity. J. Pragmat. 91, 80–93.

Haynes, A., & Schweppe, J. (2017a). LGB and T? The specificity of anti-transgender hate crime. In A. Haynes, J. Schweppe, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Critical perspectives on hate crime: Contributions from the Island of Ireland (pp. 130). Palgrave Macmillan. P.130.

Herz, Michael and Peter Molnar, eds. (2012). The content and context of hate speech. Cambridge University Press.

Howard, Jeffrey W. (2019). "Free Speech and Hate Speech". Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 93–109.

Jennifer Schweppe., Kar-wai Tong (2021) What is a hate crime?, Cogent Social Sciences, 7:1. P12.

Kaufman, Gustavo Ariel (2015). Carlos Sánchez Gutiérrez, ed. Odium dicta: Libertad de expresión y protección de grupos discriminados en internet. México, D.F.: CONAPRED.

Kaufman, Gustavo Ariel (2015). Odium dicta. Libertad de expresión y protección de grupos discriminados en internet. México, D.F.: CONAPRED. Carlos Sánchez Gutiérrez, ed. p.139-180.

Kinney, Terry A. (5 June 2008). "Hate Speech and Ethnophaulisms". The International Encyclopedia of Communication.

Levin, J., and McDevitt, J. (2020). In 'Hate Crimes in Transition' R. Sternberg (Ed.), Perspectives on Hate: How it Originates, Develops, Manifests, and Spreads. Washington, DC: American Pyschological Association.

Massanari, A. (2015). Gamergate and the fappening: how Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media Soc. 19, 1–18.

Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Inform. Commun. Soc. 20, 930–946.

Maxime Lepoutre, “Can ‘More Speech’ Counter Ignorant Speech?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16, no. 3 (2019): 155–191.

Michael S. Waltman and Ashely A. Mattheis, “Understanding Hate Speech,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of Communication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).

Molnar, P. (2012). Free Speech Debate. Why Hate Speech Should Not Be Banned. Available online at: http://www.freespeechdebate.com/en/discuss/why-hate-speech-should-not-be-banned

OHCHR (2013). UN Human Rights Office Rabat Plan of Action on the Prohibition of Advocacy of National, Racial or Religious Hatred That Constitutes Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility or Violence. A/HRC/22/17/Add.4. Available online at: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/SeminarRabat/Rabat_draft_outcome.pdf

Paterson, J., Walters, M. A., Brown, R., & Fearn, H. (2018) The sussex hate crime project: Final report, University of Sussex.

Perry, B. (2001). In the Name of Hate. Routledge. p.10.

Perry, B. (2003). Where do we go from here? Researching hate crime. Internet Journal of Criminology, p.9.

Perry, B., & Alvi, S. (2012). ‘We are all vulnerable’. International Review of Victimology, 18(1), 57. p.57.

Relia, K., Li, Z., Cook, S. H., and Chunara, R. (2019). “Race, ethnicity and national origin-based discrimination in social media and hate crimes across 100 US cities,” in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019), Vol. 13, 417–427. Retrieved from: https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3354

Roversi, A. (2008). Hate on the Net. Extremist Sites, Neo-fascism On-line, Electronic Jihad. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Sam Keen, Faces of the Enemy: Reflections on the Hostile Imagination (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1991), 10

Saunders, R. V. [2000] 1 Cr App R 458. P. 74-75.

Schweppe, J., Haynes, A., & Walters, M. A. (2018). Lifecycle of a hate crime: Comparative report. ICCL.

Sharma, S. (2013). Black Twitter? Racial hashtags, networks and contagion. New Format. 78, 46–64.

Stone, Geoffrey R. (1994). "Hate Speech and the U.S. Constitution." Archived 27 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine East European Constitutional Review, vol. 3, pp. 78-82.

Teun A, van Dijk Dijk (2011) . Discurso y poder: Contribuciones a los Estudios Críticos del Discurso. Gedisa. P.187.

Udupa, S., and Pohjonen, M. (2019). Extreme speech and global digital cultures. Int. J. Commun. 13, 3049–3067.

Vertovec, S., and Wessendorf, S. (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash. European Discourses, Policies and Practices. London: Routledge.

Volokh, Eugene (5 May 2015). "No, there's no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 June 2017.

Walters, M. A. (2014). Hate crime and restorative justice: exploring causes, repairing harms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walters, M. A., Paterson, J. L., McDonnell, L., Brown, R. (2020). Group identity, empathy and shared suffering: Understanding the ‘community’ impacts of anti-LGBT and Islamophobic hate crimes. International Review of Victimology, 26(2), 143–162.

Wolfe, L., & Copeland, L. (1994). Violence against women as bias-motivated hate crime: Defining the issues in the USA. In M. Davies (Ed.), Women and violence (pp. 204). Zed Books. P.203.

• مواقع الانترنت.

• https://dangerousspeech.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Dangerous-Speech-Guidelines-2013.pdf

• https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/hate-speech

• https://items.ssrc.org/disinformation-democracy-and-conflict-prevention/classifying-and-identifying-the-intensity-of-hate-speech/