Male EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Error Correction in Language Education
Teachers’ Perspectives on Error Correction in Language Education
Keywords:
EFL, Error, Error correction, GenderAbstract
Error analysis research has highlighted language learners' varied preferences regarding oral error correction in classroom settings. However, limited attention has been given to investigating gender differences in EFL teachers' attitudes towards error correction. This study explores male EFL teachers' perspectives on error correction in both male and female classes, encompassing aspects such as necessity, frequency, timing, type, method, and delivery agent. Participants included 60 male teachers with varying levels of experience in teaching English in Iran. Utilizing a questionnaire developed by Fukuda (2006), a paired sample t-test is used to compare attitudes between male teachers in segregated male and female classes. While no significant differences were found in the perceived necessity and frequency of error correction, variations emerged in timing, type, method, and delivery agent preferences. The findings offer valuable insights for teacher educators, policymakers, and English language instructors, aiding in the enhancement of error correction strategies in EFL classrooms.
References
Acosta, J. (2007). How Can EFL Students Be Corrected Without Hindering Oral Participation?
Universidad Nacional. Costa Rica. LETRAS 41.
Ajideh, P., Fareed Aghdam, E. (2012). English Language Teachers’ Corrective Feedback
Types in relation to the Learners’ Proficiency Levels and Their Error Types. Journal of
Academic and Applied Studies. Vol. 2(8) &2(9). https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2971
Al-Rubai’ey, F., & Nassaji, H. (2013). Direct and indirect metalinguistic feedback: A matter of suitability rather than superiority. Issues in TEFL in the Arab World, 28-43.
Boroomand, F., Rostami Abusaeedi, A. A. (2013). A gender-based analysis of Iranian EFL
learners' types of written errors. International Journal of Research Studies in Language
Learning. Vol. 2 No. 5,79-92; December 2013. DOI: 10.5861/ijrsll.2013.287
Chen, A. (2011). Application of Gender Difference and Topic Preference to Promote Students’
Motivation for Online EFL Learning. Providence University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Damaso, K., Williams, P., & Heathcote, A. (2020). Evidence for different types of errors being associated with different types of post-error changes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01675-w.
Dordinejad, F. G., & Porghoveh, T. (2014). The relationship between EFL teachers’ gender and their success as perceived by learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 599-603.
Fuchs, S., Kahn-Horwitz, J., & Katzir, T. (2019). Theory and reported practice in EFL literacy instruction: EFL teachers’ perceptions about classroom practices. Annals of dyslexia, 69(1), 114-135.
Jiménez, J. E., de la Cadena, C. G., Siegel, L. S., O’Shanahan, I., García, E., & Rodríguez, C. (2011). Gender ratio and cognitive profiles in dyslexia: a cross-national study. Reading and Writing, 24(7), 729-747.
Jones, E. (2003). The European miracle: environments, economies and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2020). 12 Corrective Feedback and Good Language Teachers. Lessons from good language teachers, 151.
Pishghadam, R., Norouz Kermanshahi, P. (2012). An Investigation into Teachers’ Feedback on
Learners’ Errors: Gender and teacher Experience. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,
Vol. 3 (3). Policy. Ethiopia. UNESCO-IICBA. Doi: 10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n3p589.
Qian, W. A. N. G. (2015). A study of the influence of gender differences on English learning of senior high school students. Higher Education of Social Science, 8(6), 66-69. DOI: 10.3968/7173.
Rahimi, A. & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2012). Impact of Immediate and Delayed Error Correction on
EFL Learners’ Oral Production: CAF. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. ISSN
‐2117. Vol. 3 (1) January 2012. Doi: 10.5901/mjss.2012.03.01.45.
Rasaei, E. (2010). The effect of gender on error correction: An SLA perspective. India’s first
weekly ELT newsletter. Retrieved January 11, 2016, from eltweekly.com.
Ratnadi, N. N. A., Nitiasih, P. K., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2014). A Descriptive Study of Male and Female Teachers’ Preferences of Strategies Used for Teaching Speaking in SMPN 1 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 3(1).
Taipale, P. (2012). Oral errors, Corrective feedback, and learner uptake in an EFL setting.
The University of Jyväskylä, Department of languages English.
Tan, C. (2020). Digital Confucius? Exploring the implications of artificial intelligence in spiritual education. Connection Science, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2019.1709045.
Taqi, H. A., Al-Darwish, S. H., Akbar, R. S., & Al-Gharabali, N. A. (2015). Choosing an English Teacher: The Influence of Gender on the Students' Choice of Language Teachers. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 182-190.
Thirumalai, MS, et al. (2011). Gender Differences and L2 Writing. India. LANGUAGE IN
INDIA, Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, Volume 11: 7 July 2011.
Tomková, G. (2013). Error Correction in Spoken Practice. Masaryk University Faculty of Arts.
Department of English and American Studies.
Wang, L. E., & Fang, F. G. (2020). Native-speakerism policy in English language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non-native English-speaking teachers. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1778374.
Wood, T. (2012). Teacher Perceptions of Gender-Based Differences among Elementary School
Teachers. Saint Louis University, United States. International Electronic Journal of
Elementary Education.
Zhang, Z. (2020). Learner engagement and language learning: a narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maryam Hamzehloo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
