Civilization: the Dominant’s Ideology to Otherness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2023.04Keywords:
Civilization, Dominant, Elective Affinity, Ideology, Otherness, Post-colonialAbstract
Civilization, although an over-consumed notion used eagerly to differentiate societies’ ability to progress/not progress through time and space, taking into consideration internal and external features, challenges the post-colonial pursuit for transforming the colonial discourse into self-empowerment and its intention towards re-creation of the long-lost original identity. In an attempt to discuss the menace the term plays in entrapping the post-colonial consciousness into a game of otherness, this article views the concept of civilization as the dominant’s ideology towards the implementation of otherness as a doctrine. Otherness takes many forms; among them are the creation and the maintenance of different tools for defining the self in order to define the Rest as the Other. To explain this process, the researcher first sketches the history of the concept and its historical metamorphoses and then elucidates the importance behind its emergence after the Age of Enlightenment. The article subsequently reveals how civilization has been a colonial ideology all along, created and preserved through different discursive means, to shape the future of the post-colonial societies. Finally, the researcher proposes post-colonial civilizations to refer to those civilizations mingled not by geographical, religious, or cultural bounds but by sharing the experience of being subordinated by the one dominant civilization.
References
Ashcroft, B. (2001). On post-colonial futures: Transformations of a colonial culture. A&C Black.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2003). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ateş, D. (2008). Civilization and universal history in conceptualizing globalization. Zonguldak Karaelmas University Journal of Social Sciences, *4*(8), 171-184.
Blumenbach, J. F. (1775). De generis humani varietate nativa [On the natural variety of mankind]. Apud Vandenhoek et Ruprecht.
Braudel, F. (1980). On history (S. Matthews, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1969)
Boer, R. (2005). Civilization. In T. Bennett, L. Grossberg, & M. Morris (Eds.), New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society (pp. 31-33). Blackwell Publishing.
Cox, R. W. (2000). Thinking about civilizations. Review of International Studies, *26*(5), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500002176
Ferguson, A. (1767). An essay on the history of civil society. A. Millar & T. Caddel.
Launay, R. (2021). Savagery in 18th-century Scotland: An intellectual portrait of Adam Ferguson. In Bérose - Encyclopédie internationale des histoires de l'anthropologie. https://www.berose.fr/article2168.html
Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systema naturae.
Makolkin, A. (2014). Aristotle’s idea of civilized man and pathway to civilization. Biocosmology–neo-Aristotelism, *4*(4), 369-379.
Mazlish, B. (2004). Civilization and its contents. Stanford University Press.
Mirabeau, V. R., marquis de. (1883). L'ami des hommes, ou, Traité de la population. Guillaumin.
Morton, S. G. (1844). Crania Aegyptiaca: Or, observations on Egyptian ethnography, derived from anatomy, history, and the monuments. John Penington.
Morton, S. G., & Combe, G. (1839). Crania Americana; or, a comparative view of the skulls of various aboriginal nations of North and South America. J. Dobson.
Staszak, J. F. (2009). Other/otherness. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 8, pp. 43-47). Elsevier.
Strange, S. (1995). The defective state. Daedalus, *124*(2), 55–74.
Ferguson, A. (1995). An essay on the history of civil society (F. Oz-Salzberger, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1767)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Amaria MEHDAOUI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.