Toward Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Historical Drama: Based Bayhaqi's History

Авторы

  • Alireza Nabilu Professor of the Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
  • Mahdi Taheri Asl PhD in Persian Language and Literature, Lecturer at Farhangian University, Qom, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2022.12

Ключевые слова:

Pragmatic analysis, Speech act, Illocutionary acts, Infelicitous Model, Socio pragmatics analysis, Beyhaqi’s Narration of Hasanak the Vizier

Аннотация

This paper shows how classic Persian drama can be studied into pragmatics, utterances use three kinds of felicity conditions including content, sincerity and prepatory conditions. The violation of the mentioned conditions creates infelicitous model. It means that interlocutors disobey felicious conditions to convey their intentions successfully. The data samples taken from Beyhaqi history which is a historical drama resulting in tragedy which begins with the death of Ghaznavid great sultan, and ends with the destruction of a powerful chief minister. Adopting pragmatic analysis, present study   investigates the dialogues of Bayhaqi's History so that it intends to study how characters do their communicative purposes while they produce their utterances. The result of the research founded that because of caution, fear, and some cultural schema, the interlocutors use infelicitous strategies to make reader familiar with monarchy situation in which no one had right to freedom speech.  

Библиографические ссылки

Allott, N. (2010). Key terms in pragmatics: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Al-Mulk, N. (2002). The Book of Government, Or, Rules for Kings: The Siyar Al-Muluk, Or, Siyasat-nama of Nizam Al-Mulk: Psychology Press.

Austin, JL. (1975). How to do things with words: Oxford university press.

Beeman, WO. (1986). "Language, status, and power in Iran: Indiana University Press.

Beeman, WO. (2020). Ta’ārof–the key to Iranian social behavior. Persian Linguistics in Cultural Contexts: Routledge; pp. 44-60.

Beyhaqi, A. (2011). The History of Beyhaqi:(the History of Sultan Masʻud of Ghazna, 1030-1041: Ilex Foundation.

Bublitz, W., Norrick, NR. (2011). Foundations of pragmatics: Walter de Gruyter.

Burke, M. (2017). The Routledge handbook of stylistics: Routledge.

Cuddon, JA. (2012). A dictionary of literary terms and literary theory: John Wiley & Sons.

Cummings, L. (2010). The Routledge pragmatics encyclopedia: Routledge.

Hamid, M.N.S. (2019). Reading History in Historical Literature: An Analysis of the Historical Novel Kalbu Qalha. Malay Literature, 32(1), pp.16-36.

Haryanti, RD. (2016). A sociopragmatic analysis of interruptions by the male characters in marc cherrys desperate housewives season 1 TV series: Yogyakarta state university.

Iranica, E. (2019). Encyclopaedia iranica. Center for Iranian Studies-Columbia University. 1985;7(08).

Kazemimojaveri, E. (2016). A short introduction to Iranian drama. Mimesis Journal Scritture della performance,(5, 1):64-78.

Katouzian, H. (2012). Iranian history and politics: The dialectic of state and society: Routledge.

Leech, G. (2016). Principles of pragmatics: Routledge.

Lee, S. (2012). A pragmatic analysis of defamation and slanderous remarks. Ene.;37(2):401-16.

Levy, R. (1951). A Mirror for Princes the Qabus Nama.

Lu, F.M. (2004). A Pragmatic Account of Pride and Prejudice. MA thesis, Guangxi University:7-25.

Moradi, HG. (2017). Despotism in Iran: Dorrance Publishing.

Mulyanto, M., Fabiola, MPDPD, Kurnia, D. (2019). Pragmatic Analysis of the Dialogues in Arthur Miller’s Drama “The Crucible”.

Mulyanto, Slamet Setiawan, and Fabiola D. Kurnia. (2019). "Pragmatic Analysis of the Dialogues in Arthur Miller’s Drama “The Crucible”." Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics 61, 53-67.

Sharifian, F. (2005). The Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi: A study of compliment responses in Persian and Anglo-Australian speakers. Pragmatics & Cognition. 2005;13(2):337-61.

Tayebi, T. (2018). Implying an impolite belief: a case of tikkeh in Persian. Intercultural Pragmatics.;15(1):89-113.

Young, LE. (2019). The psychology of state repression: Fear and dissent decisions in Zimbabwe. American Political Science Review.;113(1):140-55.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2022-05-31

Как цитировать

Nabilu, A. ., & Taheri Asl, M. . (2022). Toward Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Historical Drama: Based Bayhaqi’s History. LANGUAGE ART, 7(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2022.12

Выпуск

Раздел

Article

Похожие статьи

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.