On the Cause of the Asymmetric Distribution between Scrambling and Postposing in Japanese
Keywords:Scrambling, Postposing, Discourse Analysis, Japanese, Givōnian approach
Japanese exhibits a large degree of flexibility in terms of word order. Thus, not only SOV but also OSV (scrambling) and SVO (postposing) are grammatical. In terms of discourse function, there are some similarities between scrambling and (non-pause type) postposing. According to Author (2017) and Shimojo (2005), scrambled objects and postposed elements are anaphorically salient but cataphorically non-salient. Yet, Shimojo (2005: 202) observed no example with a postposed object. In order to explain this tendency, I propose that scrambling is not as costly as postposing due to the following two reasons. First, scrambling follows given-new-ordering whereas postposing does not. Second, rightward movements are more costly than leftward movements in Japanese (Fukui: 1993). Therefore, postposing is expected to be selected when scrambling cannot be chosen. As scrambling can be used for the object but not for the subject in SOV, postposing is dominantly utilized for subjects.
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of View. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and Topic, pp. 25-55 New York: Academic Press.
Chujo, K. (1983). Nihongo tanbun-no rikaikatei: Bunrikaisutoratejii no sougokankei (The Interrelationships among Strategies for Sentence Comprehension). Japanese Journal of Psychology, 54, pp. 250–256.
Clancy, P. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In T. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language, pp. 35-53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Farmer, A. (1984). Modularity in syntax: A study of Japanese and English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fujii, Y. (1991). Reversed word order in Japanese: A discourse pragmatic analysis. Gengo Kenkyū, 99, pp. 58-81.
Fukui, N. (1993). Parameters and optionality. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp. 399-420.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse, pp. 5-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Givón, T. (1988). The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance and attention. In M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studiesin syntactic typology, pp. 243-284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Givōn, T. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological Introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Givón, T. (1994). The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In T. Givón (Ed.), Voice and inversion, pp. 3-47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Hinds, J. (1982). Ellipsis in Japanese discourse. Alberta, Canada: Linguistic Research, Inc.
Hinds, J. (1983). Topic continuity in Japanese. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A crosslinguistic quantitative study, pp. 43-93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Imamura, S. (2014). The Influence of givenness and heaviness on OSV in Japanese. In W. Aroonmanakun, P. Booonkwan, & T. Supnithi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 224-233, Bangkok: Chulalongkon University.
Imamura, S., Sato, Y. & Koizumi, M. (2014). Influence of information structure on word order change and topic marker WA in Japanese. In W. Aroonmanakun, P. Booonkwan & T. Supnithi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 432-441, Bangkok: Chulalongkon University.
Imamura, S. (2015). The effects of givenness and heaviness on VP-internal scrambling and VP-external scrambling in Japanese. Studies in Pragmatics, 17, pp. 1-16.
Imamura, S. (2016). A corpus-based analysis of scrambling in Japanese in terms of anaphoric and cataphoric co-referencing. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 4, pp. 39-49.
Imamura, S., Sato, Y. & Koizumi, M. (2016). The processing cost of scrambling and topicalization in Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00531
Imamura, S. (2017a). A pragmatic account of scrambling and topicalization in Japanese. Lingua, 191 & 192, pp. 65-80.
Imamura, S. (2017b). Information structure in Japanese: Scrambling, topicalization, and passives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
Ishii, Y. (2001). Presuppositional effects of scrambling reconsidered. In K. Inoue & N. Hasegawa (Eds.), Linguistics and interdisciplinary research: Proceedings of the COE International Symposium. Center of Excellence in Linguistics, pp. 79-101. Tokyo: Kanda University of International Studies.
Kamio, A. & Takami, K. (1998). Danwa-to jōhōkōzō (Discourse and Information structure). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Karimi, S. (2005). A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Koizumi, M. & Tamaoka, K. (2010). Psycholinguistic evidence for the VP-internal subject position in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp. 663-680.
Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp. 269-320.
Kuno, S. (1978). Danwa-no bunpō (Grammar of discourse). Tokyo: Taishūkan.
Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. The University of Chicago Press.
Kuno, S. (1995). Null elements in parallel structures in Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing, pp. 209-33, Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Kuroda, S. (1988). Whether we agree or not? In W. Poser (Ed.), Papers from the 2nd international workshop on Japanese sSyntax, pp. 103-143. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental rRepresentations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Publishing.
Masunaga, K. (1983). Bridging. In S. Hattori & K. Inoue (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguistics, pp. 455-460. Tokyo: Proceedings Publishing Committee.
Maynard, S. (1989). Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization through Sstructure and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Ono, T. & Suzuki, R. (1992). Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and Grammaticalization, Text, 12, pp. 429-445.
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 223-56, New York: Academic Press.
Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Seraku, T. & Ohtani, A. (2016). The word-order flexibility in Japanese novels: A Dynamic Syntax perspective. In T. Ogata & T. Akimoto (Eds.), Computational and Cognitive Approaches to Narratology, pp. 213-44. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Seraku, T. (2015). Nihongo-no kōchibun: Monogataridanwa-kara-no shiza (Postposing in Japanese: A view from narrative discourse). Journal of the Society of Japanese Language and Literature, Japanology, 70, pp. 71-96.
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shimojo, M. (1995). Focus structure and morphosyntax in Japanese WA and GA, and word order flexibility. Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Shimojo, M. (2005). Argument encoding in Japanese conversation. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shimojo, M. (2006). Properties of particle “omission” revisited. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, pp. 123-140.
Simon, M. E (1989). An analysis of the postposing construction in Japanese. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
Suzuki, M. (2000). Word order variation in Japanese: Characteristics of OSV word order. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Takami, K. (1995). Kinōteki kōbunron-niyoru nichieigo-hikaku (Comparative Studies of Japanese and English under Functional Perspective). Tokyo: Kuroshio.
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H. & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic Roles, Case Particles or Grammatical Functions? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, pp. 281–332.