The Role of Metaphor and Metonymy in the Semantics of Persian Adjectival Preverbs: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22046/LA.2017.10Keywords:
Adjectival Preverbs, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Metonymy.Abstract
In this paper, a semantic classification for Persian adjectival preverbs based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory is presented: adjectival preverbs that demonstrate metaphorical shift and adjectival preverbs which lack metaphorical shift. The metaphors involved in the first subclass of adjectival preverbs are motivated by a certain type of conceptual metonymy known as “Effect for Cause”. The second subclass covers preverbs whose combinations with the light verb does not show any metaphorical shift. Having detected two mentioned cognitive processes in the formation of the semantics of the complex predicates containing the first subclass of preverbs, the compositional nature of the semantics of the predicates was realized and two new meanings for “kærdæn” (to do) as a light verb in Persian complex predicates were proposed: to become and to make oneself. Another finding of this paper is the introduction of “/pejda kærd/” as the first two-word light verb of Persian.
References
Bateni, M. R. (1989). farsi zabani aghim? Adine. 33, pp. 66-71.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1997). Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. 27(2), pp. 25-59.
Folli, R., H. Harley and S. Karimi. (2005). Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua. 115(10), pp. 1365-1401.
Ghomeshi, J. and D. Massam. (1994). Lexical/Syntactic relations without projection. Linguistic Analysis. 24, pp. 173-217.
Golfam, A. and F. Yusefirad. (2002). zabanshenasi-ye shenakhti va este’are. Tazeha-ye Olum-e Shenakhti. 4(1), pp. 59-64.
Karimi, S. (1997). Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional. Lexicology. 3, pp. 273-318.
Karimi-Doostan, Gh. (1997). Light verb constructions in Persian, Ph.D. Thesis in General Lingustics, Essex University, England.
Karimi-Doostan, Gh. (2008). Predicative nouns and adjectives. Dastoor, (3), pp. 187-202.
Khanlari, P. (1973). tarikh-e zaban-e farsi. Tehran: Bonyad-e Farhang-e Iran.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, Eds., Ortony, A. Cambridge University Press, pp. 202-251.
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
Lambton, A.K.S. (1953). Persian grammar: Including key to Persian grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Megerdoomian, K. (2001). Event structure and complex predicates in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 46, pp. 97–125.
Pantcheva, M. (2010). First phase syntax of Persian complex predicates: Argument structure and telicity. Journal of South Asian Linguistics. 2(1), pp. 53-72 .
Panther, K. U. and L. Thornburg. (2007). Metonymy. In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Eds., Geeraerts, D. and H. Cuyckens. Oxford University press.
Samiian, V. (1983). Origin of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Tabataba’ei, A. (2005). fe’le morakkab dar zaban-e farsi. Name-ye Farhangestan, 7(2), pp. 26-34.
